The three writing spaces that I most frequently use are e-mail, Microsoft Word, and the traditional pen and paper method.
When I use e-mail, it is for the sole purpose of efficiency. E-mail is rapid, most of the time informal and allows for a prompt response if necessary. I use Microsoft Word for the production of school papers, projects, and work. The editing process of a document is made simple with this program and eliminates the cumbersome task of having to rewrite an assignment when additions need to be added or changes need to be made. I use the traditional pen and paper method when I want my writing to take on a more personal tone. When using pen and paper, I want my reader to know that I am taking the time to personalize my correspondence by using handwritten text, an envelope and a postage stamp. Although these three types of writing spaces have unique characteristics, they all promote dialogues, which is one of the primary purposes of writing.
When discussing remediation as defined by Bolter and Grusin, Microsoft Word created a newer medium for school assignments, writing projects, and work by improving the task of editing and the elimination of the use of carbon paper (I’m dating myself here!). Another example of their definition of remediation is e-mail and how it has not necessarily replaced writing with pen and paper, but has certainly improved the efficiency of writing and the ability to reach numerous recipients of a particular writing piece whether it is a casual note, opinion, or work product.
In summary, the various forms of writing spaces all attempt to improve our ability to communicate with others and demonstrate that writing technology can be just as natural as writing with the traditional pen and paper. In terms of time, writing technology is relatively new and most of us struggle with what is known as a cultural lag.